The acting Capitol Police chief will testify before a House committee as Congress continues to investigate the violence.
Police at the United States Capitol were aware of the possibility of violence from armed extremists when the Capitol was attacked by supporters of former President Donald Trump, but intelligence did not indicate the extent possible of the event and officers were overwhelmed by “insurgents”, the acting police. The Chief must testify at a hearing in the House.
Information collected before January 6 aggression on Capitol Hill suggested the rally would have the participation of “armed militiamen, white supremacists and other extremist groups,” Yogananda Pittman said in prepared testimony due to be delivered to the House appropriations committee on Thursday.
Pittman was the deputy chief of police for the department’s protection and intelligence operations and was responsible for its Interagency Intelligence and Coordination Division (IICD) on the day of the riot, which came after weeks Trump claimed that the election had been “stolen” and moments after the former president organized a rally urging his supporters to “fight” the results.
The IICD said in an assessment released Jan. 3 that Trump supporters saw Jan. 6 as the last opportunity to overturn the presidential election results and that their sense of hopelessness and disappointment “could lead to more great incentive to become violent ”.
“While the Department was ready to neutralize and remove individuals or groups engaging in civil disobedience or violence among the demonstrators, it was quickly overwhelmed by the thousands of insurgents (many of whom are armed) who immediately and without provocation began to attack the officers, bypassing physical barriers refusing to comply with legal orders, ”added Pittman.
“The Department’s preparations were based on information gathered from its law enforcement partners like the FBI and other members of the intelligence community, none of which indicated a massive insurgency of this magnitude. would perform on the US Capitol on January 6, ”she said. .
Pittman also says the department faced “internal challenges” in responding to the riot. Officers did not properly lock down the Capitol complex, even after an order was given over the radio to do so. She also says officers did not understand when they were allowed to use lethal force and that the less than lethal weapons the officers had were not as effective as expected.
The attack on Capitol Hill delayed certification of Biden’s victory by several hours, with lawmakers forced to flee the angry mob that overwhelmed security forces. Five people died in the violence.
Investigations come in Trump’s wake acquittal February 14 in a Senate trial after being indicted for “incitement to insurgency” for his role.
Lawmakers also announced they would create an independent 9/11-type commission to investigate the riot.
An FBI warning that a protest by Trump supporters could turn violent reached Capitol Police the day before the attack, but senior officials responsible for securing Congress that day did not see it. they told lawmakers on Tuesday.
Pittman’s predecessor, Steven Sund, said that while Capitol Police had prepared for “the possibility of violence” and armed protesters, they had not trained for “the possibility of a coordinated attack style. military involving thousands of people against the Capitol ”.
Sund also said he requested the deployment of National Guard troops two days before Jan.6, but former House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving told him “he was concerned” the perspective “of the presence of the National Guard”.
Irving Tuesday refuse that optics played a role in the decision not to preemptively deploy National Guard troops, claiming instead that “the intelligence did not warrant it.”